Home |
The other location alleged to be Alexander's tomb was the site of the mosque of Nabi Danial. These two mosques Nabi Danial and Athanasius are not far away from each other, and some confusion during the dark ages of Alexandria can be justified.
The present Mosque of Nabi Danial was built at the end of the 18th46 century and restored in 1823 by Mohammed Ali. A smaller shrine, probably the mosque of Dzoul Karnein - the Sire with the two horns - preexisted on the site47. The location is very close to the intersection of the ancient Via Canopica and the street R5. In its crypt there is a catafalque, made in the Moslem tradition. It is said to contain the remains of the scholar and venerated teacher Prophet Daniel and his companion Sidi Lokman el Hakim, a religious story-teller.
A Russian monk, Vassili Grigorovich Barskij49 , visited Alexandria in 1727 and 1730 and made a plan of the city. Near the Kom el Dick mound he drew a small Mohammedan shrine, among ruins, that could well be the predecessor of the Nabi Danial Mosque. I cannot refer to his written description of the city, as Barskij's work is only partially translated and only fragments have been studied. The Danish Captain Norden visited the town in 1737, but tried in vain to find the tomb of Alexander50. Similarly, James Bruce 30 years later in 1768 looked for the tomb of the Great Macedonian, "asking the Arabs, the Jews, the Greeks51 and others, but none were able to show him the location". However, at the end of the 18th century, Sestrini was shown the sarcophagus in the Attarine mosque as having been Alexander's tomb.
It is interesting to note that, strangely enough Konstantios, in his writing, and Barskij53 in his plan do not mention either of the Mosques. Were they have shown one of the Mosques as being the location of Alexander's tomb, and was it because of bigotry or because of their superior knowledge of history that they do not even mention these humble Mohammedan shrines as possible remains of the famous Mausoleum? A new impulse was given to the legend of the tomb of Alexander the Great in the middle of the 19th century. In 185054 a certain Scilitzis of the known Greek family in Alexandria, dragoman-interpreter to the Russian consulate of the town, produced a fantastic story. It happened that, while guiding some European travellers entrusted to his care, he entered the crypt of the Nabi Danial Mosque. He "descended into a narrow and dark subterranean passage and came to a wooden worm-eaten door. Looking through the cracks of the planks he saw a body with the head slightly raised lying in a crystal coffin. On the head, there was a golden diadem. Around were scattered papyri, scrolls and books. He tried to remain longer in the vault but he was pulled away by one of the monks of the Mosque, and notwithstanding his repeated attempts to return, he was forbidden the area of the Crypt. Scilitzis apparently made a written report to the Russian Consul and to the Greek Patriarch of Alexandria55. It is obvious that Scilitzis had read Dion Cassius and may have had access to the subterranean passage under the Mosque, but he is not telling the truth. How can we believe that in the humid climate of Alexandria, papyri and books could have survived for over two millenia? Unlike Ambroise Scilitzis's story, which may be described as an enormous hoax56, we cannot dismiss as such the written report of Mahmoud Bey el Falaki. This learned Egyptian astronomer and engineer visited the crypts under the Nabi Danial Mosque some ten years after Scilitzis while trying to carry our the difficult task of drawing a map of the ancient town as ordered in 1865 by the Khedive Ismail57.
El Falaki was not an archaeologist, so we can be skeptical about his conclusions, but I would not question his sincerity and he must be considered as a reliable witness. His description raises some questions: Who decided and why, to force El Falaki to suspend his survey of the subterranean passages? Falaki was working for a project sponsored by the reigning Khedive. Why did he not appeal to his powerful patron? Why did he drop his investigation? But, before the end of the 19th century, we have a story that must be taken with reservation. It concerns the alleged discovery made in 1879 by a chief mason and the Cheih of the Nabi Danial Mosque. The story goes that while doing some masonry work in the basement they supposedly entered the vault and reached an inclined subterranean passage. They both walked for some distance and could discern some monuments made of granite ending with an angular summit. The mason wanted to proceed further but the Cheih ordered him to return. The entrance was walled up and the mason was asked not to reveal that incident59. The specific connection of Alexander with the site of Nabi Danial mosque is attested at least from the earlier part of the 19th century by Yacub Artin Pacha, who wrote to Zogheb60. Photos: (top) The Mosque of Nabi Danial - photograph from the beginning of the 20th century; (middle) head of Alexander; (bottom) Engraving of the Alexandrian Catacombs.
Notes: |